HOME | CALENDAR |  33133 STORE |  AD RATES
Welcome to the Grapevine

News you can use. - Sunlight is the best disinfectant

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Burn Notice receives city permission to stay in Grove

expo1
Burn Notice will continue to be based at the Expo Center in Coconut Grove through the 2010 televison season and maybe get a one year extension after that. The City Commission passed a resolution at 3:30 pm today after a long drawn out love fest in the commission chambers by fans and people involved with the show. The production company was literally filming a few blocks away at the time. Pics here from yesterday's shoot.

Commission Chairman, Joe Sanchez feels that in light of the hard economic times, we need to keep money pouring into the city without asking for government bailouts. He made this clear at today's City Commission meeting regarding Burn Notice.

He and many others want the show to remain in the Expo Center in Coconut Grove and he made a resolution to keep it. He explained how Burn Notice not only provides jobs and money to our city, but also major publicity.

$60 million dollars has been poured into the local economy, so far, by Burn Notice according to Comm. Sanchez.

Comm. Michelle Spence-Jones then took over as chair of this hearing and she did an excellent job of moving things along.

Burn Notice producer Terry Miller spoke before the commission today, he said that 95% of the crew and cast were local people, including Terry. Actress Sharon Gless was also present, she plays the mother on the show, Madeline, and she lives in Miami, too. Terry made it clear that Burn Notice is the number one show on cable tv today.

Sharon Gless stood before the commission. She has been a Miami resident for 13 years. She also spoke about all the local jobs created by the show and she reiterated the $60 million that has been brought into the community after all actors and producers have been paid. She explained how Toronto was not able to accommodate Cagney and Lacey, her first tv show, in the 1980s, and so production picked up from Toronto, where the pilot was shot, and the moved back to Los Angeles and in that time, $125 million was pumped into Los Angles by the show, rather than Toronto.

She went on to explain that she and everyone knows that a park would be great in the spot where the Expo Center stands now, but currently they are throwing millions at us, why turn that down now? She also went on to say that the show glorifies Miami and does not tear it down.

Terry made it clear that this is a thriving business in a terrible economic time. Each episode that airs, is an incentive for other producers to come to Miami to film, according to Terry.

Two people in the audience were against keeping Burn Notice at the Expo Center, the rest of the chamber was full of supporters.

Rep. Carlos Lopez-Cantera was present, he was instrumental in getting more incentive money from Tallahassee for tv and movie production in our area.

Bill Talbert of the convention bureau, also spoke in favor of the show. He said, "Burn Notice is an infomercial for the City of Miami." A free infomercial. Local producer, David Frankel, also spoke in favor of the show. He once had a tv show called "Grapevine." Gotta love that. He recently directed "Marley and Me," which used the Expo Center to film many scenes.

Sam Todesco, location manager, spoke in favor, too. He goes back to the Miami Vice days and claims, rightly so, that Miami Vice was the main reason South Beach had such a major turn around in the 1980s.

Village Council member and chamber member Michelle Niemeyer also spoke in favor. The Chamber of Commerce provided a resolution in favor of keeping the show in Coconut Grove, Liliana Dones, Chamber prez, drew up the last minute letter. Michelle suggested that the rent being paid for the Expo Center by Burn Notice should go to the park's Waterfront Master Plan fund.

The two people in the audience who were against the plan seemed to disappear when it was their time to speak. So no one spoke up against keeping Burn Notice here. They wouldn't dare in front of the actors and producers and politicians who spoke in favor.

At the end of all of this, our own district Commissioner Marc Sarnoff spoke in favor of park space. He agreed that Burn Notice should stay in Miami, but not in the Grove's Expo Center. He says the city has lost too much money by having Burn Notice in the Expo Center, that they don't pay their way, costs are higher to run the Expo Center than what they pay and the city kicks in the rest.

Comm. Sarnoff says that the city does have the money to take down the convention center and clean up the place for a park, City Manager Pete Hernandez verified this. He also said there are two sites available in the city for Burn Notice to move to. But the producer of the show, Terry Miller feels that the Grove has all he needs. He feels the best place for Burn Notice is to be here, Coconut Grove. It's either here or out of Florida according to Miller.

So Comm. Sarnoff's idea now is to keep Burn Notice here for another year or two and to have all rents paid go right into a trust fund for the Waterfront Master Plan, agreeing with Michelle Niemeyer on this. He would like them to pay for the whole year, not just for the five months or so that they pay now -- that is $20,000 per month for a total of $240,000.

Comm. Tomás Reglado was very much for this plan. He felt we needed to go further to make Miami the film capital of the east, second to New York. Comm. Michelle Spence-Jones also was in favor. She looked at the big picture of the money coming in.

Comm. Angel Gonzalez, then out of nowhere, asked for the site to be a major convention center. Guess he didn't know there is a Parks Master Plan for the site, which does not include that. He was right about Miami losing convention business to South Beach and other areas, but that is a discussion for another time. The convention center should be downtown, not in the Grove.

In the end, Comm. Joe Sanchez presented a resolution to keep Burn Notice at the Expo Center for one more year, paying all rents, 12 months' worth, into the trust fund for the new park. The resolution passed unanimously. Burn Notice is here for another year!

YOU MAY NOT LIFT THE PHOTOS & TEXT. IT'S COPYRIGHTED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. YOU CAN HOWEVER SHARE A STORY ON SOCIAL MEDIA BY USING THE LINKS HERE.
For linking to this one story, just click on the time it was posted & just this story will open for sharing - only through social media. Not copying and pasting.

28 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah Grape, and go Joe you may have just won my vote, let's see what you do for the office building? I knew Joe could become a Groveite!
Thanks Grape without you this issue may have been pushed under the rug!

May 28, 2009 4:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent. Miami and the Grove on TV worldwide, every week. Thanks to the Commission and to you too Tom.

May 28, 2009 4:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tom this truly is one of the best articles you have written. Great work. You have taken on an issue and published it. Thank you. This takes your blog to the next step where you can bring out the 'what's really going on' issue in the area.

Much appreciated and keep up the good work!

May 28, 2009 4:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good to know Regalado stuck to his guns.

May 28, 2009 4:39 PM  
Anonymous Florence said...

Thanks, Tom.

May 28, 2009 4:43 PM  
Anonymous sailfast said...

When Burn Notice is thru with the Expo Ctr, they should work out a sweet deal with City of Miami to take down the Expo Ctr in a huge season blockbuster final season show. Everyone who is associated with Burn Notice are really good people. Glad they R staying

May 28, 2009 4:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting, I just read the Waterfront Master Plan story that you linked. I didnt know that Regalado gave the idea for them actually staying in the first place.
I guess I should read the Grapevine more before I throw stones. :-\
jj

May 28, 2009 4:57 PM  
Anonymous Chi said...

great news for Miami and for Burn Notice! Thanks Tom for all your efforts with this!

May 28, 2009 5:41 PM  
Anonymous that guy said...

Glad to hear they will be here longer. Let's keep them as long as the show runs.

I was also glad to see Joe Sanchez on the right side and making strong arguments. Juxtapose, we had Mr. Sarnoff lost in his own little world. How did we elect this guy again? I'll admit, I was asleep at the wheel and didn't know a thing about him.

May 28, 2009 7:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good job, Tom. I think you single handedly put this issue on the map.

Now can somebody please tell me what is with Marc Sarnoff? Is he trying to turn our entire neighborhood into one dog park or traffic circle?
Bob Coultas

May 28, 2009 8:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can't believe Sarnoff is still agains this! Is he out of his freakin mind?

May 28, 2009 8:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I posted my objections to giving Burn Notice anymore time at the convention center, but I guess that argument is moot now. Nobody to blame but myself as I chose to put some extra time in at work instead of voicing my opinion at the commission meeting. I would much rather stay positive than dwell on issues I can not change.

But, I would ask everyone to note that taxpayer money is going to support this production and that is an issue that should be rectified.

Thank you Mr. Sarnoff for sticking to your word and looking out for the future of the Grove and not bowing to the quick buck. Sorry, last shot...positive from now on...

May 28, 2009 9:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sour Grapes on the Grapevine.

May 28, 2009 9:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Commissioners did the right thing. This is a no brainer

May 28, 2009 11:21 PM  
Anonymous jkh said...

to anon 9:11..Please take a business course that explains ROI (return on investment). I imagine it is probably 1,000 % to 5,000 % ie- taxpayer money -dollars- (whatever you think you mean by taxpayer money) for a previously unused facility, divided into $6,000,000. Actually probably 6,000,000 % ROI. Better than what I get at the bank!

May 29, 2009 12:53 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 9:11. You thank Sarnoff for 'sticking to his word'. Please, he folded! His word was to vote against .. he voted for! He has played both sides of the fence since his election.

Could you give Grape's readers, and Grape who did a great job with this issue, how much money 'Taxpayers' are paying for this production? Didn't think so.

Keep up the good work Grape!

May 29, 2009 7:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is cool, some might get to meet Gabrielle Anwar. Gonna start watching the show, for her and to see glimpses of our Village. Now seriously, they could overhaul the exterior of the Expo Center, it's really an eye-sore when Gabrielle Anwar isn't in sight.

The Waterfront plan must go on, let this movie or others in the future go on.. But they could use the rent monies to open up some WATER Views some other places. CI

May 29, 2009 8:44 AM  
Anonymous What eyesore? said...

As a visitor from Chicago, I must say you people who say the expo center is an eyesore are the most spoiled brats I have ever seen. I see palm trees, a decent building and a nice area. You don't know what eyesores are, come and take a tour of the South Side.

If you guys don't want burn notice, we do, send them up here, we'll tream them right. We can use the millions.

May 29, 2009 8:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whateye sore,, you're obviously from outta town. Get on your feet one day, and look at the decrepit, disregarded Expo Center building. Open your eyes. Now tell me it's a beautifull piece of Art, awesome architecture, huh? Hope you see Gabrielle Anwar when you go take a closer look, or it might be an ugly sight.

May 29, 2009 9:07 AM  
Blogger SteveBM said...

Im glad that this production is allowed to stay. Unfortunately they have been given a doomsday contract that will expire eventually. Its too bad that the Expo Center finally finds a way to be very useful to the community right before its planned destruction. Id like to see the Expo Center continue to be a film studio for the years and years to come.

People that bitch about and Expo Center really need to find something better to do with their lives. Its a building. Its been in the Grove for decades. Is it really worth getting all bent out of shape about? I doubt it. Go outside, go to the beach, take a walk in the Grove and stop acting like such a bunch of curmudgeons.

I cant wait for the next Commissioners election so we can bid farewell to Sarnoff.

May 29, 2009 10:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Expo Center is not an eyesore and nothing that a few trees in front of it couldn't help. The State of Fl verified they bring 51 mil dollars to the State so if there is a deficit in their rent payments, WHO CARES! That is really going GREEN. This is the best thing to happen to Coconut Grove in a long time. I bet Mayor Diaz is pretty upset with Sanchez for bringing this up. When Diaz gets his Burn Notice he wants to leave as the Green Mayor and this gets in the way.

May 29, 2009 1:39 PM  
Anonymous swlip said...

I'm glad that the production is staying, but $20k per month for a studio is extraordinarily cheap. Is the production company paying that year-round, or only when they are in production?

May 29, 2009 3:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

to SWLIP .Please read anon at 1:39.In addition the state of fla gives a total of $6 million in tax breaks to the film/tv industry this year(far less than many other states.The state realizes the importance of this industry. $51 mil generated by burn notice (not my figures)and $70 mil free advertising for Miami just from the show showcasing Miami. $20 k rental a month - Hell - the city should be PAYING the burn notice production co.

May 29, 2009 5:28 PM  
Anonymous swlip said...

I used to work in the "business," so none of those stats are news to me. You forget, though, that on a larger scale these are the same arguments that are used to justify subsidizing sports stadiums. The additional problem with subsidizing studio space is that it undermines the private sector, which offers studio space but can't possibly compete with $20k per month.

Again, I'm glad that the production is staying, but there are some principles at stake, here. We were told at the Commission meeting that the rental payments would go into a trust account dedicated to building park space after Burn Notice is gone. My question, again, is: Is Burn Notice paying that rent year-round or only for those months that it is in pre-production and production?

May 30, 2009 10:37 AM  
Blogger Tom Falco said...

The answer to that SWLIP is in the story.

May 30, 2009 10:39 AM  
Anonymous Michelle Niemeyer said...

The amendment Marc proposed, which passed, required payment of rent for the entire year.

May 30, 2009 10:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

to swlip from anon anon at 5:28. I agree with you that a city subsidizing a business that couyld be provided by the prive scetor is a problem - EXCEPT - in burn notice's case they were only setting up production in Miami BECAUSE of the low rent.There were other states that would have made the same deal. Your argument about the stats is incorrect.Most public and private groups disagree about the value of a sports stadium with public money benefiting the local economy. NO public or private group anywhere in the USA disputes the value and residual value of any tv - movie - production in their area.

May 30, 2009 11:26 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The State of Florida states Burn Notice spent a minimum of $51 mil in the state during the last three years. Burn Notice provides the best publicity piece possible. Any city and any state would love to have a business which spends $51 mil over three years.

Heck, the taxpayers pay Frank Nero the head of the useless Beacon Council $450,000 a year to attract businesses and he never delivers. In fact, "$450,000 per year" Frank Nero lobbied elected officials to give the Marlins a $2 bil bailout. Hello. The Marlins and all its employees were already here. Nero only lobbied for the Marlins to appease Carlos Alvarez so Nero would continue getting overpaid. The $2 bil wasted on the Marlins means hundreds of actually worthy businesses will get nothing.

By the way, Joe Sanchez, as Manny Diaz's tool, was a main cheerleader for the Marlins bailout. Guess who hires them after November?

May 31, 2009 10:45 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home